How can Asian countries
survive without Tibetan glaciers and water?
Image Credit: Flickr / laika_ac
By
Dechen Palmo,
Environment Research Fellow at the Tibet Policy Institute
The Tibetan plateau,
which holds the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH) ice sheet, is known as the world’s
“Third Pole.” It holds the largest number of glaciers and snow after the Arctic
and Antarctic. The Tibetan plateau has more than 46,000 glaciers, 14.5 percent
of the world’s total. These glaciers give birth to Asia’s major river systems —
the Indus, Sutlej, Brahmaputra, Irrawaddy, Salween, Mekong, Yangtze, and Yellow
Rivers that provide lifelines to many countries and support a population
of around 2 billion people.
But due to climate
change, the Tibetan plateau’s glaciers are depleting faster than anywhere else
on earth. The loss of Tibetan glaciers means the loss of livelihood for the
people who are dependent on these rivers — over a quarter of the world’s
total population.
Under the International
Center for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), experts from different
regions have come together to develop the first Hindu Kush Himalayan assessment report, which
was released on January 5, 2019. The report corroborates a 2014 report by the International Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) showing that as temperatures rise with climate change, at least
one-third of the Hindu Kush Himalayan glaciers will be depleted by 2100, even
if global warming is held at 1.5 degrees Celsius.
This report has
received much media attention due to its alarming scientific findings of
glaciers melting on the Hindu Kush Himalayan region, which would, in turn,
would impact the overall water, energy, and food security in the region.
Impact of Glacier
Retreat on Water Resources
Glaciers on the Tibetan
plateau play a key role in supplying perennial water for many countries. But
there is a growing concern about the impact of glaciers melting on the Tibetan
plateau and the availability of water in the region.
The Tibetan plateau has
seen an increase in temperature of approximately 0.3 degrees C every 10
years. This means that over the past 50 years the temperature has increased by
1.3 degrees C, which is three times the global average. If this current
trend continues, many Chinese scientists believe that 40 percent of the
plateau’s glaciers could disappear by 2050. Scientists from the Chinese Academy
of Sciences (CAS) also predict that temperature on the plateau will increase by
up to 4.6 degrees C by
the end of the century. Professor Liu Shiyin, who led a survey on these
glaciers, said that retreating glaciers will release meltwater
and create lakes, and ultimately it will lead to disaster.
As a unique and high
plateau, the Tibetan plateau is highly sensitive and vulnerable to global
climate change. In the past few years, the Tibetan plateau has seen a record
number of floods, landslides, and mudslides as well as increases in lake volume
in different parts of Tibet.
The impact of natural
disasters on the Tibetan plateau is not only restricted to the plateau, but it
has consequences far beyond it — for example, in a downstream country like
India. The entirety of agriculture in northern India is highly dependent on
rivers originating in Tibet and any changes in the flow of these rivers
will have significant consequences. Then there are also extreme events such as
glacier lake outburst floods (GLOF) that could pose an immense danger for many
countries. In October 2018, debris blocked the flow of Yarlung Tsangpo River in
Tibet, which threatened downstream India and Bangladesh with flooding.
The melting of glaciers
will initially cause more floods in the region until they melt completely,
providing more water in the short term. But in the long run, with depleted
glacial ice, a runoff will be dramatically reduced. Many scientists predict
that the quantity of runoff water from melting glaciers is likely to increase
at least until 2050, and then it will decrease.
The Voice of America (VOA) quoted a former
researcher of the Chinese Academy of Science who wanted to remain anonymous. In
the interview, he said, “Diminished glacial runoff had already reduced water
levels on the Yangtze and Yellow river.”
An average of 247
square kilometers of glacial ice has disappeared every year since the 1950s. Continued shrinking of glaciers will
affect runoff and water resources downstream, then it will induce water
scarcity.
Moreover, in addition
to climate change, the unregulated construction of Chinese dams and canals
might further exacerbate the impact of climate change and increase the problem
of water scarcity. With China’s ambition to reduce carbon emissions by
developing clean energy, China is likely to build more dams along transboundary
rivers.
Geostrategist Brahma
Chellaney writes: “China, by building increasing control over
cross-border water resources through hydroengineering structures, is dragging
its riparian neighbors into high-stakes games of geopolitical poker over
water-related issues.” Hence, Tibet’s water resources have become an
increasingly crucial strategic, political, and cultural element that the
Chinese are intent on managing and controlling.
With a large proportion
of the region’s population already living in poverty and dependent on natural
resources for food and livelihood, limiting access to fresh water will push the
entire region deeper into vulnerability.
Conflict and Water
Scarcity
China has control over
Tibet, “the Water Tower of Asia,” and thus the future of Asia’s water lies in
China’s hands. China, a water scarce country due to uneven distribution of
water resources, is facing considerable pressure on water resources to meet its
own industrial growth, urbanization, and population growth.
China is expected to
face a 25 percent supply gap on projected water demand by 2030, with two-thirds
of its cities already facing difficulty in accessing water. In 2006, a World
Bank working paper on water scarcity claimed that “China will soon become the
most water-stressed country in East and Southeast Asia.”
Moreover, China is
facing domestic water conflicts, mainly on issues like inter-jurisdictional
water pollution and hydropower dam construction. These domestic water conflicts
and water scarcity could provoke civil unrest. Therefore, these concerns might
compel China to utilize transboundary rivers to meet its water scarcity
challenge. The development of water infrastructure projects on Tibet’s
transboundary rivers has already infuriated many downstream countries and
triggered international criticism. For example, China’s construction of
hydroelectric dams along the Brahmaputra River has become a source of friction
between China and India. China has also dammed the upper Mekong River, which
has become a major source of conflict between China and Southeast Asian
countries.
There is no formal
agreement between China and downstream countries over the use of shared river
systems. By 2025, water scarcity is predicted to affect 1.8 billion people,
particularly in Asia. Therefore, any alteration to the flow stemming from Tibet
could have dire consequences for all. These reports add another concern and
challenges to the region. As the volume of water decreases, the likelihood
of conflicts between China and downstream countries is likely to
increase. Chellaney predicted in 2014 that these rivers are destined to become
“Asia’s new battleground.”
Many scholars and
experts have warned about possible future “water wars” between China and India,
and the same dynamics could play out in Southeast Asia. The key to mitigating
transboundary water conflicts and advancing water cooperation in Asia is
largely in the hands of China.
It is a time to
recognize Tibet’s importance to regional security. The ICIMOD assessment report
is one of many reports confirming the melting of glaciers on the Tibetan
plateau, which could cause significant disruptions to future water scarcity. To
effectively address the impacts of climate change on the Tibetan plateau and
transboundary water conflict, there is a need for a regionally integrated
approach to water resources management.
If unsustainable
practices and mismanagement of water resources are not addressed, fresh water
will become a precious commodity, the control of which could spark conflicts in
Asia. Mistrust over shared rivers remains high between China and its neighbors.
If China and the rest of the continent want to turn potential water conflict
into constructive engagement, then a water dialogue is necessary.
Source: The aritcle orginally appeared on thediplomat.com, Date - March 28, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment