According to reports, the authorities of Shannan Prefecture
in southern Tibet have ordered to stop plans to run lake cruises on sacred
Yamdrok Lake.
Recently, as part of the tourism development program of the Nagarze county, a tour company had already bought and launched a tour boat on the Yamdrok Yumtso (Tibetan: ཡར་འབྲོག་གཡུ་མཚོ་, Wylie: yar-'brog g.yu-mtsho) and was planning to offer rides around the lake beginning next month. Besides, the program also included setting up over 200 beach umbrellas on the shore of the lake. On May 24, the tour company and the Langkazi county government launched a tour boat named Qomolangma, which was bought from inland districts in China and also began trial runs reports Global Times.
Reports suggest that the Nagarze county (སྣ་དཀར་རྩེ་རྫོང་) government quashed the plan following directives of Shannan prefecture (Tibetan: ལྷོ་ཁ་ས་ཁུལ།, Wylie: lho-kha sa-khul) government in order "to protect the local environment," a man surnamed Feng from Qomolangma Tourism Development Company (QTDC) told the Global Times, refusing to provide further details.
"When I heard the news I was full of tears. Thanks for the power of the Internet and media," Yang Erche Namu, a famous Mosuo ethnic group (originally Tibetan) singer and writer, wrote on her Sina Weibo Yesterday (June 18).
Yamdrok Tso
Yamdrok Tso is one of the largest sacred lakes in Tibet. It
is over 72 km (45 mi) long and covers an area of 638 km² in area with its depth
still unknown. Lying between Gyantse and Lhasa, the lake is surrounded by many
snow-capped mountains and is fed by numerous small streams. Its form is believed to have the shape of a great
scorpion and is sacred to the Tibetan people as one of the four "Great
Wrathful Lakes" and abode of the guardian Goddess Dorje Gegkyi Tso. The
lake, the islands and all the adjacent hills and mountains are closely
associated with the deeds of Padmasambhava who established Buddhism in Tibet in
the Eighth Century. A number of important monasteries are situated around the lake, among them Samding, the seat of Dorje Phagmo.
Yamdrok Yumtso photographed from the Gampa pass (on the road between Lhasa and Gyantse) Courtesy:Wikipedia |
Tibetan Buddhists as well as Bonpos hold that the environment is populated by spirits, such as the Naga in the waters and the Sadak in the ground. Polluting the water or digging in the ground will upset these spirits and they are provoked to harm human beings, for example through diseases. In addition, it is believed that Yamdrok Tso is connected with the `life power' (Tibetan bLa) of the Tibetan people. Thus, it is understandable why Tibetans have been so strongly opposed any harm to the sanctity of the lake and any stain caused by its commercialization.
The Controversial Yamdrok Yumtso Hydro Power Plant
Yamdrok Yumtso, has a controversial power station that was
completed in 1996 near the small village of Pai-Ti at the lake’s western end.
The late Tenth Panchen Lama was able to halt the construction works of this
most destructive of all development projects on the
Tibetan plateau but just months after His death in 1989 it was announced that
the construction would proceed as planned.
Unlike other hydro dam projects that
block a river's course and drain the water through turbines to produce
electricity, this project instead drains a natural lake by placing the turbines
in 6 km tunnels bored 10 km below the water surface into the mountain sides surrounding the lake.
This unnatural interference with the lake's flow is severely
threatening the fragile balance of the lake's ecology and with it the
livelihood of the local people as well as the wildlife that flourishes around
this lake. Moreover, the plant caters to the needs of the growing numbers of
Chinese immigrant population and the industries they are developing while
Tibetans stand to gain little.
The issue of the development of tourism as well as generation
of electricity and its utilization has once again highlighted the larger issues
of Tibetan rights over natural resources; respect for the religious and culture
sanctity of sacred sites; and the question of development for whom and at what cost?
No comments:
Post a Comment